Pastor Rebukes Candace Owens as MAGA Splinters Over Charlie Kirk’s Death
The assassination of Charlie Kirk, the 31-year-old conservative activist and founder of Turning Point USA, has triggered grief across the right. Yet the aftermath has quickly devolved into infighting, with conspiracy theories — fueled by Candace Owens — stirring outrage among Kirk’s allies and forcing his pastor to speak out.
VIDEO:
A Pastor’s Plea for Decency
Rob McCoy, co-chair of Turning Point USA’s faith division and a close friend of Kirk’s, rebuked Owens for spreading rumors about the killing. McCoy praised Kirk’s generosity of spirit, noting that although he sometimes disagreed with Owens, he “never operated nor entertained gossip or innuendo” about her. He urged her to emulate Kirk’s restraint, saying that if tragedy had struck her, he “would never have treated Candace or her family in such a way.”
McCoy’s intervention highlights the unease among many conservatives who see Owens’ behavior as dishonoring Kirk’s memory at a time when unity is needed.
Owens Fuels Conspiracies
Since the shooting at Utah Valley University last week, Owens has suggested Kirk was targeted for his critical views on Israel and the war in Gaza. She warned followers to be “suspicious of those telling us to stop asking questions,” and claimed billionaire Bill Ackman threatened Kirk during a recent meeting in the Hamptons.
Ackman, a vocal supporter of Israel, categorically denied the charge. In a lengthy post, he said he never pressured or threatened Kirk, describing their encounters as cordial and respectful. Andrew Kolvet, executive producer of
A Broader Divide on Israel
Owens’ accusations touch on an increasingly sensitive subject within MAGA: Israel. While the movement has historically been strongly pro-Israel, Kirk himself expressed frustration with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, according to conservative commentators. Tucker Carlson, for instance, accused Netanyahu of “hijacking Charlie’s memory” and using his death to bolster political aims. Carlson said Kirk was “appalled by what was happening in Gaza” and resented Netanyahu’s influence on U.S. foreign policy.
Though few conservatives endorsed Owens’ conspiratorial narrative, several admitted Kirk had been uneasy about the political pressures surrounding Israel. This tension illustrates how foreign policy debates are becoming fault lines within the MAGA coalition.
Candace Owens Under Fire
Owens’ willingness to embrace provocative claims is nothing new. She is already facing a defamation lawsuit in France for spreading false rumors about First Lady Brigitte Macron’s gender identity. Her latest attacks against Ackman risk opening fresh legal battles. Ackman has accused her of “slander,” though it remains unclear if he will pursue litigation.
The backlash suggests that Owens’ brand of provocation — once an asset in the MAGA universe — is now testing the patience of even her allies.
A Movement in Turmoil
Charlie Kirk’s assassination was expected to unify conservatives in grief. Instead, it has revealed simmering resentments: disputes over Israel, distrust of establishment figures, and the widening gap between those seeking discipline and those exploiting tragedy for attention.
Pastor McCoy’s rebuke was more than a defense of Kirk’s memory; it was a warning about the corrosive power of conspiracy theories in a fragile movement. As MAGA mourns its young star, the question is whether it can resist tearing itself apart in the process.
The Forbidden Bloodline of Princess Diana: A Tudor Secret That Could Rewrite Royal History
For decades, the world has adored Princess Diana as the “People’s Princess” — a woman remembered for her compassion, courage, and humanity. But new revelations suggest that Diana’s legacy is far more complex, reaching into centuries of hidden history. At the heart of these whispers lies a secret that could redefine the monarchy itself: a
The Spencer Family: More Than Nobility
The Spencers have long been portrayed as an aristocratic family, respected yet firmly outside the royal succession. But beneath polished family trees lie records pointing to
Unlike the Windsors, who changed their German name from Saxe-Coburg and Gotha in 1917, the Spencers could trace their blood back through centuries of English aristocracy and directly into Tudor royal circles
Henry FitzRoy: The King’s Illegitimate Son
One of the most striking connections in Diana’s lineage runs through Henry FitzRoy, the openly acknowledged illegitimate son of Henry VIII and Elizabeth Blount. Born in 1519, FitzRoy was granted titles, wealth, and influence — the king’s living proof of virility. Though FitzRoy’s life ended early, his descendants lived on quietly through noble lines. Over generations, that bloodline flowed toward the Spencers and, ultimately, into Diana herself.
Catherine Carey: The Daughter of a Secret Affair?
Equally explosive is Diana’s link to Catherine Carey, the daughter of Mary Boleyn — who at the time was Henry VIII’s mistress. Many historians argue that Catherine was Henry’s child, not her husband William Carey’s. If true, then Diana inherited
A Return of Forbidden Blood
These connections mean that Diana’s sons, Prince William and Prince Harry, do not only descend from the Windsor family. They also carry the sidelined legacy of Henry VIII, Charles II, James II, and other monarchs who fathered children outside of wedlock
What once was erased or excluded from official succession records has quietly survived through centuries, protected by families like the Spencers. Diana’s bloodline represents a reunion of legitimate and illegitimate royal heritage
The Custodians of Hidden Blood
Historians note a consistent pattern: the Spencers’ marriages often aligned with families tied to unacknowledged heirs. Over time, they became a
When William eventually takes the throne, he will not only inherit the Windsor crown. He will embody the genetic unification of England’s most powerful and scandalous dynasties — a living reconciliation between past betrayal and modern legitimacy.
Diana’s True Legacy
Diana’s compassion and authenticity made her beloved worldwide. Yet her bloodline tells a parallel story. She was more than a princess chosen for her grace; she was
Her untimely death in 1997 silenced not just a humanitarian voice, but also the living custodian of England’s most hidden royal blood. Today, her sons carry that legacy forward — proof that history cannot erase what flows in the veins of its heirs.
